(2) Chapters III-XIII contain remarks on medical
etiquette, fees, patients' whims, quacks, consultants,
lecturing to large audiences, late
learners. These remarks are sometimes connected,
but follow no plan.
(3) Chapter XIV contains a few disconnected remarks
on illnesses and invalids.
So the work as a whole shows no signs of a prearranged
plan. It is disjointed and formless. As
far as subject-matter is concerned, the three parts
distinguished above ought to be classed under
separate branches of medicine :--
(1) This belongs to the theory of medicine, or
rather to the theory of science generally.
(2) This belongs on the whole to etiquette
(εὐσχημοσύνη).
(3) This consists merely of a few disconnected
hints. Littré justly says of it (IX. 248): " J'y
vois done une de ces intercalations que les
copistes se permettaient quelquefois é la fin
d'un traité, soit, comme dit Galien, pour grossir
le volume, soit pour placer quelque fragment
qu'on ne savait ou mettre, et qui, autrement,
s'en allait perdu."
Yet it is remarkable that there is a certain style
common to all three parts which points to the conclusion
that the compiler, whoever he was, was no
mere " paste-and-scissors " man, but an author who
stamped his characteristics even on his borrowings.
This style is marked by a studied aphoristic brevity
combined with a genius for choosing out-of-the-way
terms and expressions. It so happens that in addition
the author appears to have been an imperfect