medical writings in the Hippocratic collection are
occupied almost entirely with endemic disease and
do not describe plagues, not even the great plague
at Athens. There is no mention of smallpox or
measles ; no certain reference occurs to diphtheria,
scarlet fever, bubonic plague or syphilis. It is
extremely doubtful whether typhoid was present in
Greece, for although it is similar to severe cases of
καῦσος and φρενῖτις, the latter were certainly in most
cases pernicious malaria, which is often so like
typhoid that only the microscope can distinguish
them. It is expressly stated by pseudo-Aristotle
that fevers were not infectious, and it is difficult to
reconcile this statement with the prevalence of
typhoid. The question must be left open, as the
evidence is not clear enough to warrant a confident
decision.See Stéphanos, La Gréce, p 502. |
Colds, "with and without fever," See Epidemics IV., Littré V., p. 149. | were common
enough in ancient times, but whether influenza
prevailed cannot be stated for certain. Its all too
frequent result, pneumonia, was indeed well known,
but it is puzzling that in the description of epidemic
cough at Perinthus,
Epidemics VI., Littré, pp. 331-337. | the nearest approach to an
influenza wave in the Hippocratic collection, it is
expressly stated that relapses into pneumonia were
rare.
Consumption (φθίσις) is one of the diseases most
frequently mentioned in the Corpus, and it is remarkable
that in the very passage where we are told
| | Image Size: 240x320 480x640 960x1280 1440x1920 1920x2560
|