[p. 293]
could never be enforced ; if they could have been,
and if a physician had one or two rich pupils, his
financial position would have been enviable. A
share in the livelihood of rich men, relief when in
need of money, free education for children--these
advantages would make it superfluous, not to say
unjust, to require any μισθόσ2 in addition.
It may well be that the συγγραφή of ἄνευ μισθοῦ
καὶ συγγραφῆσ2 was a private agreement between
teacher and taught, quite distinct from the present
document, in which case συγγραφὴν τήνδε will refer
either to such an agreement appended to the Oath,
or more probably to the Oath itself, which might be
called a σνγγραφή in the wider and vaguer sense
of that term, though it is not precise enough for
the legal indenture.
Some scholars regard the Oath as the test required
by the Asclepiad Guild. The document, however,
does not contain a single word which supports this
contention. It binds the student to his master and
his master's family, not to a guild or corporation.
But if the Hippocratic oath ever was a real force
in the history of medicine, it must have had the
united support of the most influential physicians.
Whether this union was that of something approximating
to a guild we cannot say.
The Oath contains a sentence which has long
proved a stumbling-block. It is :--οὐ τεμέω δὲ οὐδὲ
μὴν λιθιῶντας2, ἐκχωρήσω δὲ ἐργάτῃσιν ἀνδράσι πρήξιος2
τῆς1δε. If these words are the genuine reading, they
can only mean that the taker of the oath promises
not to operate even for stone, but to leave operations
for such as are craftsmen therein. It has seemed
an insuperable difficulty that nowhere in the Hippocratic