Electronic edition published by Cultural Heritage Langauge Technologies (with permission from Charles Scribners and Sons) and funded by the National Science Foundation International Digital Libraries Program. This text has been proofread to a low degree of accuracy. It was converted to electronic form using data entry.
SEDGWICK, ADAM (b. Dent, Yorkshire, England,
22 March 1785; d. Cambridge, England, 27
January 1873), geology.
species. This belief was grounded in his
strong sense of the “designful” beauty of organisms:
although he was not primarily a paleontologist,
his favorite lecture subject was the adaptive
significance of fossil mammals. But his concept of
teleology was philosophically unsophisticated, and
like Paley (whose work had influenced him deeply)
he simply wished the contemplation of organic design
to nourish the sense of wonder that would
lead the mind toward God.
Any theory of the transmutation of species by
natural means therefore seemed to Sedgwick to
threaten this preparatory function of natural theology
and to lead to a “train of monstrous consequences.”
Above all, since he saw clearly that
whatever applied to other species ultimately must
apply to man, the consequences of any evolutionary
theory seemed to him to include the denial of
the reality of the “moral” realm. Although a devout
Christian, Sedgwick was no fundamentalist in
religious matters: he was a prominent member of
the Broad Church party within the Anglican
Church, and was greatly concerned to see progressive
science and enlightened theology working independently
toward an ultimate synthesis of truth.
But this meant that he was as much concerned to
expose the pretensions of a naïve materialism that
undermined man's moral responsibility as he was
to attack simplistic “reconciliations” between geology
and Scripture. Thus in his presidential addresses
of 1830 and 1831 he criticized the popular
“Scriptural geologists” even more vehemently than
the proponents of transmutation. His influential
Discourse on the Studies of the University (1833)
linked a reassertion of the place of geology within
the tradition of natural theology with a trenchant
criticism of utilitarian moral philosophy; and the
same concerns later were expressed vehemently in
a major anonymous review (1845) of Robert
Chambers' Vestiges of the Natural History of
Creation.
Sedgwick was angered not only by the inaccuracies
and pseudoscientific pretensions of Chambers'
unsigned book: more fundamentally he feared
that the specious plausibility of its all-embracing
principle of naturalistic “development” would
undermine the sense of personal responsibility that
he believed was basic to the nature of man in society.
He reiterated his views even more vehemently
in a vastly enlarged fifth edition of the Discourse in
1850; by the time Darwin sent him a copy of the
Origin of Species, Sedgwick's antipathy to the
“materialistic” tendencies of evolutionary theories
had become so obsessive that his reaction was
predictable.
By the end of his long life Sedgwick had in effect
survived into a new period in the history of science;
and although he was widely admired and
even loved as a warmhearted and noble character,
many of his scientific views seemed remote and
antiquated. But in his prime he had been one of the
most distinguished geologists within an exceptionally
talented generation; and his concern for the
broader implications of science had left an enduring
mark on the place of science in university education.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
I. ORIGINAL WORKS.
Sedgwick's more important earlier
works include A Syllabus of a Course of Lectures on
Geology (Cambridge, 1821); “On the Origin of Alluvial
and Diluvial Formations,” in Annals of Philosophy, n.s.
9 (1825), 241-247, and 10 (1825), 18-37; “On the
Geological Relations and Internal Structure of the
Magnesian Limestone, and on the Lower Portions of the
New Red Sandstone Series . . .,” in Transactions of the
Geological Society of London, 2nd ser., 3, pt. 1 (1829),
37-124; “Address[es] to the Geological Society, Delivered
on the Evening of the Anniversary . . .,” in Proceedings
of the Geological Society of London, 1 (1830),
187-212, and (1831), 281-316; “A Sketch of the
Structure of the Eastern Alps . . .,” in Transactions of
the Geological Society of London, 2nd ser., 3, pt. 2
(1832), 301-420, written with Murchison; A Discourse
on the Studies of the University (Cambridge, 1833; 5th
ed., 1850; repr. Leicester, 1969); “Remarks on the
Structure of Large Mineral Masses, and Especially on
the Chemical Changes Produced in the Aggregation of
Stratified Rocks During Different Periods After Their
Deposition,” in Transactions of the Geological Society
of London, 2nd ser., 3, pt. 3 (1835), 461-486;
“Introduction
to the General Structure of the Cumbrian
Mountains . . .,” ibid., 4, pt. 1 (1835), 47-68; and
“A
Synopsis of the English Series of Stratified Rocks Inferior
to the Old Red Sandstone,” in Proceedings of the
Geological Society of London, 2 (1838), 675-685, and
“Supplement [to the same],” ibid., 3 (1841),
541-554.
In the 1840's he published “On the Physical Structure
of Devonshire, and on the Subdivisions and Geological
Relations of Its Older Stratified Deposits, &c.,” in
Transactions of the Geological Society of London, 2nd
ser., 5, pt. 3 (1840), 633-704, written with Murchison;
“On the Distribution and Classification of the Older or
Palaeozoic Deposits of the North of Germany and Belgium,
and Their Comparison With Formations of the
Same Age in the British Isles,” ibid., 6, pt. 2 (1842),
221-301, written with Murchison; “Three Letters